#FMINER PROXY FULL#
Full automation using API and integrations with other APIsĭescription: Tool to mine LinkedIn profiles based on keywords.ĭescription: Local software that can download a proxy list and let users choose which one to use.ĭescription: API to find e-mail addresses for a given domain name.ĭescription: Provide various website extraction and transformation tools.Can run scrapers manually and scheduled in the cloud or compile and run locally.Automated data validation and export to any text based format.
#FMINER PROXY CODE#
It allow for searching the HTML tree to find various tags.ĭescription: Browse AI is a cloud-based SaaS that lets you extract and monitor structured data from any website with no code through a click and extract interface. Table Of Contentsĭescription: Cloud-based scraper for JavaScript.ĭescription: A Python library for navigating and parsing results from the Please contribute by adding links, adding pros/cons, titles, or anything else you think would be helpful! It will showcase the entire list with easy navigate to their pros and cons while also providing links to their respective websites. Thus, DOCS' determination that petitioner's proxy marriage is invalid was correct and the Appellate Division order refusing to annul the determination should be affirmed, without costs.Find your way through with the Table of Contents. The sole issue presented for this court's review is whether DOCS properly applied Civil Rights Law ¤ 79-a as the basis for concluding that petitioner's out-of-State proxy marriage entered into during petitioner's life-term incarceration was invalid.Ī marriage entered into by an incarcerated life-sentence inmate is void from inception because the legislative declaration of civil death under Civil Rights Law ¤ 79-a imposes a complete disability to enter into a valid marriage ( Ferrin v New York State Dept. This is an article 78 proceeding in which petitioner, a life-sentence inmate, seeks to annul a determination of the New York State Department of Correctional Services (DOCS) that petitioner is not legally married for purposes of participation in the Family Reunion Program ( 7 NYCRR part 220). The order of the Appellate Division should be affirmed, without costs. JUDGES: Chief Judge Wachtler and Judges Simons, Kaye, Alexander, Titone, Hancock, Jr., and Bellacosa concur. Robert Abrams, Attorney-General (Robert J. A marriage entered into by an incarcerated life sentence inmate is void from inception under Civil Rights Law ¤ 79-a.ĬOUNSEL: Robert F. The Department properly applied Civil Rights Law ¤ 79-a as the basis for concluding that petitioner's out-of-State proxy marriage entered into during petitioner's life term incarceration was invalid. of Correctional Servs., 125 AD2d 573, affirmed.ĭISPOSITION: On review of submissions pursuant to section 500.4 of the Rules of the Court of Appeals (22 NYCRR 500.4), order affirmed, without costs, in a memorandum.Īn order, which affirmed a judgment dismissing a petition to annul a determination of the New York State Department of Correctional Services that petitioner, a life sentence inmate, is not legally married for purposes of participation in the Family Reunion Program ( 7 NYCRR part 220), should be affirmed. opn 125 Misc 2d 594), entered in Dutchess County in a proceeding pursuant to CPLR article 78, granting respondent's motion to dismiss a petition to annul a determination of the New York State Department of Correctional Services that petitioner's marriage was invalid for the purpose of his participation in the Department of Correctional Services Family Reunion Program. Appeal, by permission of the Court of Appeals, from an order of the Appellate Division of the Supreme Court in the Second Judicial Department, entered December 22, 1986, which affirmed a judgment of the Supreme Court (Lucille Polk Buell, J.
0 kommentar(er)
